Senate President Godswill Akpabio has slammed Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, accusing her of distorting facts and misrepresenting the Senate before the international community. Akpabio explodes over what he describes as a deliberate attempt to embarrass the legislative body, warning that such actions could have serious consequences.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, who was recently suspended for six months for violating Senate rules, took her grievances to the United Nations Inter-Parliamentary Conference in New York, where she accused Akpabio of victimization, sexual harassment, and abuse of office. Her petition to the UN has sparked outrage, with Akpabio slamming her for globalizing a Senate matter.
Akpabio Explodes Over Natasha’s UN Claims
During Thursday’s plenary session, Akpabio didn’t hold back when criticizing Akpoti-Uduaghan for taking an internal legislative issue to an international forum. He accused her of twisting the facts to suit a personal agenda, calling her actions reckless and misleading.
“I am aware that she distorted the facts and globalized the matter, embarrassing the Senate by giving a different narrative,” He acknowledged federal lawmaker Kafilat Ogbara for countering Akpoti-Uduaghan’s claims and ensuring that foreign media received a clearer version of events.
Akpabio Calls for Focus in the Senate
Speaking after receiving a vote of confidence from his colleagues, he called for an end to distractions within the Senate, emphasizing the need for lawmakers to concentrate on their legislative duties rather than engage in unnecessary controversies.
“I thank you for this vote of confidence. Let us stay focused and avoid unnecessary distractions.”
Is Natasha’s Complaint Justified?
While Akpabio slams Natasha for her actions, the controversy has led to mixed reactions. Some believe she was unfairly targeted, while others argue that Akpabio’s outrage is justified given her decision to take Senate matters beyond national borders.
However, Akpabio’s comments about women in leadership have drawn criticism, with some accusing him of using gender as a shield for political retaliation. His remarks have further fueled debates about power struggles within the Senate and the limits of free speech for lawmakers.
