The Manhattan criminal trial of disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein took a dramatic turn Thursday as State Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber declared a mistrial on the third-degree rape charge involving aspiring actress Jessica Mann.
The decision came after six contentious days of deliberations marked by juror threats and shouting matches in the courtroom, with the jury foreperson reporting intimidation attempts from fellow panelists.
While the mistrial halted proceedings on the 2013 rape allegation, jurors delivered a split decision Wednesday on the remaining charges.
They convicted Weinstein of first-degree criminal sexual act for assaulting former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006, but acquitted him of identical charges regarding aspiring actress Kaja Sokola’s 2002 allegations.
The 73-year-old Miramax co-founder now faces the prospect of a third trial on the unresolved rape count, with a hearing scheduled for July 2.
Legal Teams Clash Over Jury Conduct
Weinstein’s defense attorney Arthur Aidala announced plans to appeal, citing “gross jury misconduct” including alleged consideration of extrinsic evidence about his client’s notorious reputation.
The claim references the overturned 2020 conviction where New York’s highest court found improper witness testimony influenced jurors. Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg dismissed these concerns, praising the accusers’ courage while acknowledging the jury’s “vigorous debate” reflected the gravity of their task.
Meanwhile, despite the partial victory, Weinstein remains incarcerated serving a 16-year California sentence for separate rape convictions.
The wheelchair-bound defendant attended the Manhattan proceedings between stays at Rikers Island and Bellevue Hospital, his health reportedly deteriorating during the trial. Legal analysts note the unusual circumstance of a mistrial occurring post-deliberation, with some questioning whether prosecutors will retry the rape charge given Weinstein’s existing lengthy prison term.
Why It Matters
The case represents a pivotal moment for the movement Weinstein’s downfall helped launch in 2017, when over 100 women came forward with allegations. While Thursday’s outcome delivered some accountability through the Haley conviction, survivors’ advocates expressed frustration at the mistrial.
“This shows why victims hesitate to come forward,” said Silence Breakers organizer Ashley Judd outside court, referencing the intense scrutiny accusers faced during cross-examination.
With the disgraced mogul’s film empire bankrupt since 2018 and his health failing, this case continues to test the justice system’s capacity to address power abuses in the entertainment industry.
