In a comment that crosses the line from analysis to outright complicity, security “expert” Bulama Bukarti has launched a shocking attack on the very voices amplifying Nigeria’s genocide, accusing Donald Trump and Nicki Minaj of “adding salt to injury” for daring to spotlight the systematic slaughter of Christians.
Bukarti’s vile dismissal of global attention came during a televised interview where he sneered at the international figures for using Nigerian suffering for “political rhetoric and entertainment.” His so-called expert analysis is a deliberate and dangerous lie—a transparent attempt to silence outside scrutiny and maintain a narrative that has long whitewashed the horrific, faith-based violence terrorizing entire communities.

A Pattern of Denial
This is not an isolated incident, but part of a persistent pattern among a certain class of commentators who treat the Nigerian crisis as an abstract intellectual exercise. While they debate terminology and protocol in air-conditioned studios, villages are being razed, churches burned, and families wiped out for their faith. Bukarti’s indignation is reserved not for the perpetrators of this violence, but for those who dare to break the wall of silence and bring a global spotlight to the agony.
His specific critique of Nicki Minaj—mocking her for “laughing” after her speech—is a particularly cheap and cynical tactic. It ignores the substance of her message to focus on a fleeting, out-of-context moment, a classic tool of those who cannot dispute the facts so they attack the presenter. For the families of victims, the message of solidarity is what matters, not the perceived tone.
The real “salt in the injury” is not a rapper’s speech; it is the continued downplaying of a genocide by so-called experts. It is the refusal to name the religious nature of these attacks. It is the framing of mass murder as mere “clashes” or “farmer-herder conflicts,” a narrative that Bukarti and his peers have perpetuated for years, effectively erasing the victims and their suffering.
While Bukarti laments that a musician was invited to the UN instead of “security experts,” he fails to ask the critical question: Why have the experts failed so catastrophically?
Why, after years of their analysis and prescriptions, has the violence only escalated? The invitation to Minaj is a direct indictment of their collective failure. When local expertise produces no safety and no justice, victims will inevitably cry out to anyone who will listen, anywhere in the world.
Why It Matters
Bulama Bukarti isn’t only wrong; he is also actively gaslighting an entire population facing extermination. His statement is a weapon—a deliberate effort to shame and shut down the global attention that threatens the architects of this genocide. To watch a rapper speak at the UN and call that the insult, while corpses pile up in church pews, isn’t simply bad analysis on his part but a monstrous moral failure.
This is the ultimate betrayal from a so-called expert. He isn’t defending Nigeria; he’s defending the silence that enables the killers. His critique is a luxury of the privileged, a performance for his peers that completely abandons the people on the ground.
While he nitpicks who is worthy to speak, the blood of the victims he ignores stains his hands. This isn’t just adding salt to injury; it’s a profound betrayal of the very people he claims to serve, exposing him not as an expert, but as an apologist for atrocity whose words are as dangerous as the bullets and machetes tearing this nation apart.
















