In a bold corporate rebellion against presidential power, retail giant Costco has launched a high-stakes legal war against the Trump administration, filing a blockbuster lawsuit that demands a “full refund” of tariffs and challenges the very foundation of the president’s trade authority.
The lawsuit, filed strategically over the Thanksgiving holiday, seeks a federal court judgment declaring President Trump’s “emergency” tariffs illegal and securing Costco’s right to reclaim every dollar paid—a move that could open the floodgates for billions in refunds to American importers if the Supreme Court, which is already skeptical of the tariffs, rules against the White House.
Costco’s legal gambit comes as the nation’s highest court prepares to decide whether Trump overstepped his authority by imposing tariffs without congressional approval, a power he claims under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. With two lower courts already ruling against the president, Costco is now racing against a December 15 deadline to secure its right to a refund, arguing that without a separate legal judgment, the billions already paid to the treasury could be lost forever.

Why It Matters
Costco isn’t merely asking for its money back; it’s seeking a judicial declaration that the president’s signature trade policy was illegal from the start, a move that could unravel the entire legal and financial architecture of Trump’s “America First” trade wars.
The timing is brutal genius. By suing now, Costco forces the courts to confront the multibillion-dollar consequences of their upcoming Supreme Court decision before it’s even made. This lawsuit transforms abstract constitutional questions about presidential power into a concrete, urgent corporate demand for restitution.
The White House’s warning about “enormous” economic consequences reveals their real fear: that a Costco victory wouldn’t just refund one company—it would trigger a stampede of lawsuits demanding the return of the $90 billion in tariffs already collected. This case isn’t about retail; it’s about whether a president can fund his government through legally questionable trade taxes, and Costco just called his bluff.
















