Ivory Coast is witnessing history with President Alassane Ouattara taking office for a fourth term at 83. While the official narrative talks about generational transition and continuity, many are asking a simple question: What is an 83-year-old man still doing running the country? This new term raises doubts about the country’s political health, succession planning, and the real meaning of “generational transition” when the leader himself is almost 84.
Too Long at the Top
Ouattara has been in power since 2010 after a disputed election that divided the country. Now, with another term under his belt, it is clear that power has concentrated heavily in one individual for far too long. Even if he promises a transition to younger leaders, the reality is that his continued presence in office slows the rise of fresh voices. This is not leadership in motion: it is leadership stuck, and the Ivory Coast risks stagnation while the world praises stability.

A Question of Legitimacy
Elections that exclude major opponents cannot be seen as fully competitive. With turnout at just over 50 percent, Ouattara’s claimed near-90 percent victory looks less like a mandate and more like a managed result. These numbers do not reflect true popular support but the mechanics of political control. When a leader repeatedly wins elections under such conditions, the gap between the people and the state grows, and trust erodes quietly but steadily.
Generational Transition or Political Theater?
The president insists that this term will be one of generational transition, but the language feels more like a promise than a plan. At 83, the man at the helm still controls decision-making, appoints officials, and shapes policies. The younger generation is left watching, waiting, and learning, but not leading. Ivory Coast needs an actual transfer of responsibility, not just speeches about responsibility. A country cannot genuinely move forward if the main player on the stage refuses to step aside.
International Optics
Leaders from other African countries and former presidents attended the inauguration, sending messages of respect and legitimacy. But international applause does not change local realities. Foreign policy may remain friendly and stable, but domestic governance is what affects everyday Ivorians. When a nation’s top leadership is anchored to a near-octogenarian, it raises real concerns about flexibility, innovation, and crisis management.
What the Future Holds
The big question is whether the Ivory Coast can truly prepare for life after Ouattara. Promises of political maturity and responsibility sound noble, but the clock keeps ticking. One term for an 83-year-old may be manageable, but four terms begin to feel like a pattern of personal dominance rather than national service. Citizens, especially younger ones, deserve a system that allows them to rise and govern, not just observe.
This is a reflection of unease, a warning about the concentration of authority, and a challenge to Ivory Coast to balance experience with opportunity for new leadership. Stability is important, yes, but it cannot come at the cost of stagnation or political inertia. Leadership at any age must include letting others lead, too.












