Commercial surrogacy in the United States has evolved into a multi-million-dollar industry, a yearlong investigation into California’s assisted reproduction market highlights how international buyers, loose agency practices, and missing background checks leave gestational surrogates vulnerable while allowing individuals to commission dozens of children simultaneously without regulatory scrutiny.
Strategic Advantages and Legal Blind Spots in California
California serves as the global epicenter for commercial surrogacy due to its established legal framework, world-class medical infrastructure, and favorable court procedures for establishing parental rights prior to birth. However, legal experts point out that state statutes have not kept pace with the rapid commercialization of the industry over the past decade.
California’s legal system allows intended parents, including foreign nationals, to secure pre-birth parentage orders smoothly, making it the top destination for international clients. No federal agency tracks the number of surrogacy births, monitors the number of active contracts an intended parent maintains, or enforces standard background checks.

Outside of New York, most states do not require surrogacy agencies to hold specialized state licenses. Operations can be established with standard corporate filings, leaving financial escrows and match protocols largely unmonitored.
High-Profile Cases Expose Systemic Gaps
The investigation revealed multiple instances where wealthy buyers utilized loopholes to execute large-scale surrogacy arrangements across several states, often without the knowledge of the women carrying the pregnancies:
Mass Surrogacy Operations: In 2025, authorities in Arcadia, California, arrested a couple who had fathered at least 25 children through simultaneous surrogacy contracts across multiple states, triggering child endangerment charges after medical staff reported suspected abuse.
International Wealth and Scale: High-profile foreign nationals, including foreign tech executives, have commissioned dozens and in some reported instances, over a hundred children via U.S. surrogates to secure birthright citizenship and expand multi-child households, leaving surrogates unaware of the scale of the operations.
Vulnerability of Undocumented Surrogates: Agencies routinely recruit low-income and undocumented women, offering payouts ranging from $40,000 for single births to $70,000 for twins, figures significantly lower than the public marketing suggests, while offering few legal safeguards if disputes arise.
The absence of uniform background checks and central tracking transforms a process intended for family-building into an unmonitored commercial transaction.
Industry Response and Legislative Challenges
Legal practitioners and industry whistleblowers emphasize that targeting specific nationalities or imposing blanket bans could push surrogacy into unregulated offshore markets with even fewer human rights protections. Instead, policy advocates argue for comprehensive domestic reform:
Mandatory Screening: Enacting mandatory criminal and financial background checks for all intended parents before embryo transfer.
Centralized Databases: Creating state or national registries to prevent intended parents from entering into dozens of concurrent contracts without oversight.
Enhanced Surrogate Rights: Guaranteeing independent legal representation, full disclosure of the intended parents’ civil status, and strict regulation of escrow funds.
Bottom Line
The vulnerabilities surrounding California’s surrogacy framework demonstrate an urgent need to balance parental rights with statutory protections for gestational carriers. Without updated regulations, central tracking, and strict agency licensing, the commercial surrogacy industry risks continued exploitation by bad actors seeking to bypass ethical and legal norms.




