The brazen, systematic drone incursions over multiple Danish airports and military sites (including Aalborg, Billund, and the crucial Skrydstrup airbase) are not mere security incidents; they are calculated acts of hybrid warfare designed to expose, test, and exploit a massive gap in European defense.
While Moscow predictably dismisses the accusations as “absurd,” the pattern across the continent (from the downed drones in Poland to similar disruptions in Norway) screams of a coordinated campaign by a professional state actor.
The question is no longer if Russia is behind these incursions, but why Denmark, a quiet NATO anchor, is being targeted now. The answer lies in Russia’s asymmetric warfare playbook and Denmark’s recent, highly symbolic geopolitical moves. The primary goal is testing NATO’s response threshold.
As analyst Peter Viggo Jakobsen notes, Moscow is operating at the razor’s edge of provocation, deliberately remaining just below the threshold that would trigger a decisive military response like NATO’s Article 5. These inexpensive, low-flying drones force the mobilization of highly expensive assets (like fighter jets and police resources) creating a severe cost-asymmetry. Russia wins the economic battle every time a multi-million-dollar fighter is scrambled for a $10,000 drone.
Furthermore, this constitutes a clear act of Signaling and Deterrence (a long-tail keyword). The targeting of Skrydstrup airbase, home to Denmark’s F-16s and future F-35s, and the site of planned Ukrainian missile fuel production, is a clear, menacing signal. This is a direct, if veiled, response to Denmark’s decision to boost its military budget and acquire long-range precision weapons—a “paradigm shift” that draws Moscow’s ire.
The drone flights are a low-risk, high-impact method of saying: “Your escalation will not go unanswered.” Finally, the intent is clearly eroding public confidence. Shutting down major commercial hubs like Copenhagen, Aalborg, and Billund airport inflicts massive economic pain and, more importantly, spreads fear and insecurity among the public. This is the classic aim of hybrid attacks: to chip away at trust in critical infrastructure security and create political division, exactly as opposition lawmaker Pelle Dragsted’s justifiable criticism highlights.
