Pay TV provider MultiChoice Nigeria, owners of DSTV and GOTV, is planning to appeal a N150 million fine imposed by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT). The fine was levied for challenging the court’s jurisdiction over the company’s actions.
Tribunal Ruling
The CCPT fined MultiChoice Nigeria N150 million for disrespecting the court’s jurisdiction. Additionally, the tribunal ordered MultiChoice to grant a free one-month subscription to its subscribers.
The ruling came after MultiChoice failed to comply with the tribunal’s order not to implement a price increase, thereby undermining the tribunal’s authority in the case.
Thomas Okosu, who led the three-man tribunal panel, cited section 39 (2) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) Act.
This section states that the “tribunal shall have jurisdiction throughout the federation and on all commercial activities aimed at making a profit.”
MultiChoice’s Response
In response to the ruling, MultiChoice Nigeria expressed its disagreement and announced plans to file an appeal. The company stated:
“MultiChoice Nigeria is aware of the recent ruling by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT) regarding its jurisdiction to entertain a price regulation matter. We disagree with the ruling, and will therefore file an appeal against said ruling.”
Why it matters
This legal battle between MultiChoice and the CCPT is significant in assessing the extent of price control and the tribunal’s authority in such matters. The outcome will set a precedent for other businesses and profit-making organizations. The judiciary’s decision will be crucial in establishing its stance on regulatory and jurisdictional matters involving commercial activities.
Bottom Line
MultiChoice Nigeria is set to appeal the N150 million fine imposed by the CCPT, highlighting a critical legal confrontation that could impact future regulatory practices and business operations in Nigeria. The judiciary’s handling of this case will be closely watched for its broader implications on commercial regulation and
