The Democratic National Convention concluded on Thursday night with a significant focus on foreign relations, an area that could have profound implications for international diplomacy and policy. Key issues at the forefront of U.S. foreign policy include the potential for a ceasefire in Gaza and the ongoing supply of arms to Ukraine. The Biden administration’s struggle to resolve these crises and achieve a ceasefire has raised concerns about the direction a new administration might take, potentially influencing support for the Democrats in future elections.
The United States, known for its extensive military power and global alliances, plays a pivotal role in shaping international relations. Each U.S. administration sets its own course on foreign policy, which can be either beneficial or detrimental to its allies. With the 2024 U.S. elections looming, foreign states are increasingly anxious about the uncertainties a new administration could bring, particularly in terms of policy shifts. Ukraine, for instance, fears that a Trump administration might reduce or cut off U.S. support in its ongoing war with Russia. Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian advocates in the U.S. are concerned about the continued U.S. backing of Israel and the stagnation of peace negotiations in the region.
This adds to the stakes of the November 2024 U.S. elections, which have the potential to not only shape the future of American citizens but also influence the global landscape of international relations. Kamala Harris’s campaign has previously been vague on its foreign policy stance, but the Democratic National Convention offered much-needed clarity. In her closing speech, Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, clearly articulated her foreign policy agenda, pledging to support NATO, continue backing Ukraine, and “stand up to Putin’s aggression.” This position may offer reassurance to the Ukrainian government, which has been uneasy about potential changes in U.S. support depending on the election outcome.
Harris also committed to securing Israel, bringing hostages home from Gaza, and ending the war in the Palestinian enclave. She stated emphatically, “I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself and I will always ensure Israel can defend itself.” Harris emphasized her desire to conclude the war in a manner that ensures Israel’s security while also allowing the Palestinian people to achieve their right to self-determination.
While Harris’s foreign policy positions largely mirror those of the Biden administration, the methods of implementation might differ. Harris has pledged to end the Gaza conflict—a challenge that has eluded Biden’s administration since the war’s outset.
The conflict has encountered numerous obstacles, leading to ongoing uncertainty about the prospects for a peaceful and lasting resolution. However, Harris has promised to adopt a firmer stance with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu on the U.S. position regarding Gaza.
The success of these ambitious promises hinges on the outcome of the upcoming election. As the U.S. moves closer to November, both Americans and the global community are watching closely, anxious to see which leader will guide one of the world’s most influential nations. Whether Harris or Trump possesses the qualities necessary to steer the U.S. through these turbulent times remains to be seen, with the results of the election and the subsequent administration set to determine the future course of the nation.
