Residents of Trademore Estate in Abuja have taken a bold stand against the insensitivity of the government as they protest the planned demolition of their homes. This move by officials of the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) has sparked controversy and raised questions about the government’s commitment to the welfare of its citizens.
The estate, which recently faced the wrath of flash floods a week ago, as reported by Federal Character, was declared a disaster zone. This recurring disaster has caused immense damage to houses, vehicles, and other properties. In response, the FCDA pointed fingers at structures within communities like Trademore Estate, claiming they disrupt the natural water flow and contribute to the flooding in the city.
Shehu Ahmed, the executive director of the FCDA, justified the demolition plans by emphasizing the safety concerns associated with living in a low-line zone prone to flooding.
“By declaring Trademore a disaster zone, we have told the residents there to evacuate. The area is in a low-line zone which is not safe. Flooding can come at any time. They know this and have been experiencing it over the years,” he said.he safety concerns associated with living in a low-line zone prone to flooding.
However, residents of Trademore Estate expressed their discontent, arguing that the government should provide alternative accommodations before carrying out such drastic measures. They question the fairness of demolishing homes without adequate provisions or compensation for the affected residents, especially considering that the estate was built based on an approved plan by the FCDA.
“You can’t demolish without having alternative plans for residents. These people worked hard to put a roof over their own heads. Before the estate was built, there was a plan which was approved by the FCDA . So who is to blame for this injustice? People have established themselves in the estate? Is there an alternative accommodation for them? Or is FCDA creating more homeless people after their mistake of approving this location?”
This situation is not isolated to Trademore Estate. Similar controversies have arisen in other parts of the country. In Lagos State, the demolition of 17 shops in a market has stirred debate. The government claims that the buildings were in a state of distress and posed a risk to the lives of traders and neighboring structures. The Lagos State Building Control Agency further argues that the land on which these structures were built was unlawfully allocated by the previous administration. Similarly, in Kano State, numerous structures have been demolished, with the government citing the restoration of the Kano Urban Development Masterplan as the reason behind these actions.
The demolitions in various locations raise concerns about the government’s approach to urban development and the rights of citizens. Critics question whether these demolitions are carried out in a fair and just manner, ensuring that alternative accommodations and compensation are provided to those affected. The government’s resolve to restore master plans and reclaim public spaces has sparked controversy, leaving citizens to ponder the true motivations behind these actions.
In light of these events, it becomes imperative to reflect on the government’s responsibility towards its citizens and the need for transparent and equitable urban development policies. The plight of residents facing eviction and the destruction of their homes should not be disregarded, as it is a clear indication of the government’s insensitivity to the affairs of its own people.
What is your opinion on this issue?
