• Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Fashion & Lifestyle
  • Food & Nutrition
  • Health
Federal Character
No Result
View All Result
Federal Character
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Fashion & Lifestyle
  • Food & Nutrition
  • Health
No Result
View All Result
Federal Character
No Result
View All Result
House Committee on Constitutional Review: No State Creation Requests Meet Requirements

House Committee on Constitutional Review: No State Creation Requests Meet Requirements

Benita OrumabyBenita Oruma
1 year ago
in Government
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
Facebook ShareWhatsapp ShareX Share

The Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, Benjamin Kalu, announced that none of the 31 state creation requests submitted met the constitutional requirements for approval. This announcement was made during a two-day retreat held in Ikot Ekpene, Akwa Ibom State, from February 20th to 23rd, 2025. The retreat served as a platform for reviewing pending amendment bills and strategizing the overall constitutional review process.

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • State Creation Requests
  • Constitutional Amendment Bills Under Review:
  • Federal Structure and Power Devolution:
  • Public Hearings and Transparency:
  • Conclusion:

State Creation Requests

Kalu acknowledged the aspirations reflected in the 31 requests for state creation, but concluded that none satisfied the legal criteria outlined in Section 8 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. He also announced that the committee to allow for further submissions and potential revisions have extended the submission deadline to March 5th, 2025, with the possibility of further extensions. However, he noted that a valid state creation must comply strictly with constitutional requirements.

House Committee on Constitutional Review: No State Creation Requests Meet Requirements

Constitutional Amendment Bills Under Review:

The committee is currently reviewing a substantial number of 151 constitutional amendment bills. These bills aim to improve governance in Nigeria, covering a wide range of topics. A significant challenge identified is the duplication of bills addressing similar issues. To address this, the committee has categorized the bills into seven thematic areas:

Federal Structure and Power Devolution:

This area focuses on the balance of power between the federal and state governments.

  • Local Government Autonomy: This addresses the independence and authority of local governments.
  • Public Revenue, Fiscal Federation, and Revenue Allocation: This covers the distribution of government resources.
  • Nigerian Police and Security Architecture: This tackles reforms in the nation’s security apparatus.
    Comprehensive Judicial Reforms: This aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system.
  • Electoral Reforms: This area focuses on improving the electoral process.
  • Gender Issues and Human Rights: This focuses on advancing gender equality and protecting human rights.
  • State Creation: This area deals with new state creation requests.

This categorization will aid in prioritizing amendments based on national interest and legislative relevance. The committee noted the crucial intersection between constitutional amendments and electoral laws, emphasizing that any changes to the Electoral Act requiring constitutional alterations must be reviewed by the committee.

Public Hearings and Transparency:

The next phase of the constitutional review involves Zonal and National Public Hearings across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones. These hearings will allow citizens to contribute to the amendment process.

The scheduled locations for these hearings are: North Central (Nasarawa and Niger States), North East (Borno and Gombe States), North West (Kaduna and Sokoto States), South East (Enugu and Imo States), South-South (Bayelsa and Cross River States), and South West (Lagos and Ondo States). Kalu stressed the committee’s commitment to transparency and inclusivity, ensuring that the final amendments reflect the will of the Nigerian people.

Conclusion:

The review of the 1999 Constitution is a complex and multifaceted process, requiring careful consideration of numerous proposals and a commitment to transparency and inclusivity. While the initial wave of state creation requests did not meet the constitutional criteria, the extended deadline and planned public hearings demonstrate the committee’s dedication to incorporating the voices of all Nigerians into the process. The successful navigation of the 151 amendment bills, categorized by thematic areas, will be crucial to shaping Nigeria’s governance structure for the future. The committee’s ongoing work highlights the dynamic nature of constitutional reform and its crucial role in shaping the future of Nigeria’s democracy.

Tags: Constitutional reviewCreationfederal charactergovernmentHouse CommitteeNewsNigeria
Share234SendTweet146
Benita Oruma

Benita Oruma

Benita Oruma is a lawyer in training, a 400 level student in the university of Ibadan. She is a content writer with interest in corporate affairs and the marketplace.

Related Stories

Why the U.S. Rejected Russia’s Proposal to Take Iranian Uranium

Why the U.S. Rejected Russia’s Proposal to Take Iranian Uranium

byEriki Joan Ugunushe
0

In a move that has deepened the rift between Washington and Moscow, the United States has officially turned down a Russian offer to take control of Iran's enriched...

Iran Offers to Yield Oman Side of Hormuz to End U.S. Siege

Iran Offers to Yield Oman Side of Hormuz to End U.S. Siege

byEriki Joan Ugunushe
0

After 48 hours of a total U.S. maritime blockade that has paralyzed 90% of its economy, Tehran has blinked, in a desperate bid to restore cash flow and...

The Nobel Peace Pricer

Trump Signals Iran War Could Be Winding Down — Here’s When

bySomto Nwanolue
0

The bombs are still falling. The blockade is still tightening. But President Donald Trump is now telling the world to watch for an "amazing two days." The war...

UK vs. US: Starmer Stands Firm as Trump Pushes for War

UK vs. US: Starmer Stands Firm as Trump Pushes for War

bySomto Nwanolue
0

Donald Trump wanted the UK to join the war in Iran. Sir Keir Starmer said no. Trump kept pushing. Starmer kept refusing. Now the American president is openly...

Next Post
Rwanda Reacts Angrily to US Sanctions Related to DR Congo Violence

Rwanda Reacts Angrily to US Sanctions Related to DR Congo Violence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We bring to you precise and factual news

Recent Posts

  • Why the U.S. Rejected Russia’s Proposal to Take Iranian Uranium
  • Iran Offers to Yield Oman Side of Hormuz to End U.S. Siege
  • Alcaraz Pulls Out of Barcelona Open After Wrist Injury, Faces Setback in Title and No.1 Pursuit

Categories

  • Business and Finance
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion & Lifestyle
  • Food & Nutrition
  • Government
  • Health
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Tech

Weekly Newsletter

  • About
  • Advertise With Us
  • Cookie Policy

Copyright © FederalCharacter.com 2026 .

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Fashion & Lifestyle
  • Food & Nutrition
  • Health

Copyright © FederalCharacter.com 2026 .