The Supreme Court has reinstated Senator Samuel Anyanwu as People’s Democratic Party (PDP) National Secretary overturning the rulings of the Court of Appeal and the Federal High Court, which had previously removed him from his position.
Background of the Legal Dispute
The legal battle over the PDP National Secretary position began when a suit was filed challenging Anyanwu’s status. The case revolved around claims that his participation in the Imo State governorship election meant he could no longer hold the party’s national secretary position.
Lower Court Rulings
In October 2023, the Federal High Court ruled against Anyanwu, removing him from office. Following this, in December 2024, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision, affirming that Anyanwu’s continued claim to the role violated the PDP’s constitution. The appellate court’s majority judgment declared his appeal lacking merit and instead recognized Chief Ude Okoye as the rightful National Secretary.
Supreme Court’s Decision
On March 21, 2025, a five-member panel of the Supreme Court nullified the judgments of both the lower courts. The apex court ruled that determining the National Secretary of the PDP falls within the party’s internal affairs and is therefore not subject to judicial intervention.
Justice Jamilu Tukur, delivering the lead judgment, struck out the lower court rulings and upheld the minority judgment of the Court of Appeal, which had nullified the trial court’s decision due to a lack of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court also held that the plaintiff, Aniagu Emmanuel, lacked the legal standing to bring the suit since he failed to demonstrate how Anyanwu’s position affected him.
Implications of the Verdict
The Supreme Court’s decision reaffirms the principle that internal party matters should primarily be resolved within the party. By reinstating Anyanwu as the PDP National Secretary, the ruling highlights the judiciary’s reluctance to interfere in party affairs unless clear legal violations occur. This precedent reinforces the autonomy of political parties in managing their internal structures and leadership disputes.
